Off-Topic Anything Non-Related to the above topics.

350z vs. s2000 vs. STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2005, 07:13 AM
  #16  
Contributing Member
 
phreze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In a 240 near you
Posts: 831
Costs:
Evo VIII/RS $30,000
Evo MR $35,000
WRX STi $34,000
RX8 (221hp) $26,000
S2000 $28,000
350Z $26,000-32,000
G35 Coupe $31,000
phreze is offline  
Old 05-21-2005, 08:08 AM
  #17  
Contributing Member
 
CowboyTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,703
I pick D: All of the above!
CowboyTurbo is offline  
Old 05-21-2005, 10:38 AM
  #18  
Contributing Member
 
2fast4y0u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,254
evo8 is nimble and fast, also quoted as a bullet proof engine.
sti looks nice but expensive for aftermarket parts
s2000 very nimble in corners but its still a honda!
350z: my friend has one and its not slow at all lets just put it that way. i have an sr20det with a list of extras, im running stock boost and we raced,,,the outcome was dead even. i won because the front of my car is longer than his and he we were door to do at the finish line.

so all in all. 350z for out of the box performance.
2fast4y0u is offline  
Old 05-21-2005, 02:58 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
M374llic4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BoostGetsYouLaid
Posts: 78
I drove the STi in the back parking lot, as i work at a dealer, it was limited space, but the car had intake and exhaust and upgraded turbo, not sure what else, but i knew it had others, which is why we couldent sell it.

And I got to take the gold edition S2000 on the highway, got it up to 130 between exits.

The STi is a ****ing beast when it comes to acceleration, once you jam the pedal, and the turbo spools, I couldent even force my self forward, and my buddy in the passanger seat nearly **** him self.

IMO the STi is one of teh best performing cars for the money, It is a crazy powerful ride. <3<3
M374llic4 is offline  
Old 05-21-2005, 11:58 PM
  #20  
Contributing Member
 
phreze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In a 240 near you
Posts: 831
Evo feels much more aggresive then sti, but with an intake, exhuast, and upgraded turbo your looking at another 100+ hp to the wheels making the comparision null and void. Stock wise its different, just as it would be to upgrade all of that on any car.
phreze is offline  
Old 05-22-2005, 06:05 PM
  #21  
Contributing Member
 
LA_phantom_240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 2,550
well the 350z is a porker, the s2k has a 2 liter motor, and the sti is a 4 door. Hmmm... ill take hidden option 3 : a 1991 nissan 240sx LE fastback ... woot

****tagged by a post *********
LA_phantom_240 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FOSINGWO
For Sale - Cars For Sale
1
01-20-2009 03:46 AM
papaganoushh
Show and Shine
9
09-19-2006 06:25 PM
DARKEST_HOUR
General
5
10-17-2005 12:41 PM
twofortyessex
Off-Topic
16
03-31-2004 09:56 AM
imagin3
General
6
06-16-2003 08:12 AM



Quick Reply: 350z vs. s2000 vs. STI



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:08 PM.