Some dumbass crashed.. but i have a quest.
11-16-2005, 11:07 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 805 (socal)
Posts: 302
Some dumbass crashed.. but i have a quest.
check out the link
http://www.soompi.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=14613
So the debate is.. did he spin out due to tail braking.. or did he e-brake it. Look at pictures 2, 6, and 7 and it should give you more clues.
http://www.soompi.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=14613
So the debate is.. did he spin out due to tail braking.. or did he e-brake it. Look at pictures 2, 6, and 7 and it should give you more clues.
Last edited by Bryan; 11-17-2005 at 07:35 AM.
11-17-2005, 06:08 AM
#2
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,703
trail-braking~ look at the skid marks. There's only one set for the front wheels that he locked up. You're giving him too much credit to think that he'd actually think to pull his e-brake to try and stop faster. BTW awesome post though, that **** just made my day~ LOL.
*edit* actually not so much trail braking as slamming on the brakes at the wrong time~ do that at the apex in any fwd car and it's pretty easy to spin it.
*edit* actually not so much trail braking as slamming on the brakes at the wrong time~ do that at the apex in any fwd car and it's pretty easy to spin it.
Last edited by CowboyTurbo; 11-17-2005 at 06:42 AM.
11-17-2005, 12:33 PM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 8
looks to me that when his back end started to come out he gave it more brakes and cause the car to completely do an 180 in this picture it shows that the back tire marks are BOLD and then fade out before impact so that might show at that bold spot is when the 180 was happening
Plus if he e-braked there should be 2 rear tire marks almost simular but i only see one
if im wrong then
Plus if he e-braked there should be 2 rear tire marks almost simular but i only see one
if im wrong then
Last edited by S13_Pilot; 11-17-2005 at 12:50 PM.
11-17-2005, 04:48 PM
#4
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cape Cod, Ma.
Posts: 652
lol .. what a dope ..
I can't stop laughing, b/c in that link, the third post down some guys says: "That should buff right out."
now if we only had some comedy like that around here .. LOL
the bright side: He hit another honda, not a Nissan
I can't stop laughing, b/c in that link, the third post down some guys says: "That should buff right out."
now if we only had some comedy like that around here .. LOL
the bright side: He hit another honda, not a Nissan
11-17-2005, 08:12 PM
#6
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,703
Originally posted by steve 14
there is no debate
who ****ing care's he crashed because he was a dumb****
he e-braked
and how do i know this that car has abs
there is no debate
who ****ing care's he crashed because he was a dumb****
he e-braked
and how do i know this that car has abs
11-18-2005, 09:28 AM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 487
He is going too fast, he brakes at the wrong time while turning, weight goes to the front, tail gets loose since ur turning.
Its a FF, all the weight up front, tail comes out.
Being an unexperianced driver he brakes more, driving all the weight to the front, leaving the rear tires with no ability to do their job.
Car spins out. No ebrake req'd.
Its a FF, all the weight up front, tail comes out.
Being an unexperianced driver he brakes more, driving all the weight to the front, leaving the rear tires with no ability to do their job.
Car spins out. No ebrake req'd.
11-18-2005, 04:36 PM
#12
Contributing Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,096
in my proffesional opinion and according to the astronomical calculations based on the data gathered by the degree of the corner and the weight bias of the vehicle i conclude that he crashed presicely because he is a fu<king dumbass
11-18-2005, 06:45 PM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 8
Originally posted by Ayuaddict
in my proffesional opinion and according to the astronomical calculations based on the data gathered by the degree of the corner and the weight bias of the vehicle i conclude that he crashed presicely because he is a fu<king dumbass
in my proffesional opinion and according to the astronomical calculations based on the data gathered by the degree of the corner and the weight bias of the vehicle i conclude that he crashed presicely because he is a fu<king dumbass
11-18-2005, 06:57 PM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 20
Like the ORIGINAL poster stated, he could not see the car when it was braking and it was already dedicated to the corner. He obviously wasn't taught not to hit the brakes in the middle of a corner especially when he's doing 70+mph....
11-18-2005, 08:48 PM
#15
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,703
well you kinda have to hit the brakes no matter what... what would the alternative be? NOT hit the brakes? fly off the turn/cliff at 60 mph+? obviously u should never find yourself in the situation of flying around a blind curve in traffic on a public road at that speed, but I suppose best case scenario would be to slam the brakes while maintaining enough control of the car to minimize damage...