General For General 240sx/Silvia (s-chassis) discussions.

arrrghhh! I need help deciding (dsm/240?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2003, 08:58 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Sinfestboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: StL to Miami
Posts: 174
arrrghhh! I need help deciding (dsm/240?)

oh god, its so messed up. for about 6+ months I have been going back and forth in my head between wanting a 1g awd DSM or a S13 240 with SR.....

and now d-day is getting near. I have ~3 months to decide for sure.

right now, its leaning towards the DSM, but just barely. My dilemma is that the dsm is awd.... thats handy when you have snow for 3 months out of the year.... but I cant drift, and it doesnt look as good. but at the same time, the 240 would require the engine swap, which would cost some extra money that I would rather not spend..... but at the same time, it would be fun. and the 240 handles alot better, too. and I love the look of wide tires, and I cant do them on the DSM, but I can on the 240. But the fact is, the DSM would be much faster than the 240 in a straight line...... damnit, I CANT DECIDE!!! someone HELP!!!
Sinfestboy is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 10:10 PM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,841
Who ever told you you can't drift an awd car is a liar. Anyway to get to the point. The down side of a DSM is.... AWD DSM's tend to have weak trannies and weak center diffs. that may fail. Plus you'd be buying a really old turbo car that'd probably need a rebuild where as the 240 needs a new engine so. On the good side some of them have a pretty cool 6 speaker stereo.

Also just so you know the best year DSM's are '89-92 with the 6 bolt 4G63.
I'm with Stupid is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 12:02 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Sinfestboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: StL to Miami
Posts: 174
well, its not that they have weak trannys, their trannys are as strong as any other stock car, the problem is, with awd, the force has to be absorbed somewhere, and unfortunatly, its the tranny, and thats what breaks first.... but that can be fixed (www.bmtranny.com www.teamrip.com)

I came here looking for some convincing that the 240 is the way to go.... come on, now.
Sinfestboy is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 01:04 PM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
leiferik1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: AUSTIN BABY
Posts: 692
Originally posted by Sinfestboy

I came here looking for some convincing that the 240 is the way to go.... come on, now.
how about this.


if you DONT buy the 240 i'll break your legs and **** on your face
leiferik1 is offline  
Old 01-06-2003, 05:48 AM
  #5  
Contributing Member
 
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,841
Originally posted by Sinfestboy
well, its not that they have weak trannys, their trannys are as strong as any other stock car, the problem is, with awd, the force has to be absorbed somewhere, and unfortunatly, its the tranny, and thats what breaks first....
I guess that's a good point but they're center diffs. still break. Quaife doesn't even offer a warranty on the center diff. for the dsm. I'd prefer the GS-T offer the GSX, but that's just me. Anyway if you're so unsure about what car you want why not test drive both and then decide?
I'm with Stupid is offline  
Old 01-06-2003, 08:38 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Sinfestboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: StL to Miami
Posts: 174
Originally posted by I'm with Stupid
I guess that's a good point but they're center diffs. still break. Quaife doesn't even offer a warranty on the center diff. for the dsm. I'd prefer the GS-T offer the GSX, but that's just me. Anyway if you're so unsure about what car you want why not test drive both and then decide?
well, the thing is, when tuned, these cars act NOTHING like how they were stock. a 240, with 10 inch tires and a 300hp SR would probably be nothing like a stock 240. same deal with DSM's. so while test driving would be a little important, it wouldnt be a deciding factor.
Sinfestboy is offline  
Old 01-06-2003, 08:47 AM
  #7  
Contributing Member
 
spitz7985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 709
the GSX's awd system is 80% of the torque to the front wheels, 20% to the back. seems pretty weak to me
spitz7985 is offline  
Old 01-07-2003, 10:50 PM
  #8  
*********
Regulate
 
rbboyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 426
I've never driven an awd dsm, but i'd take the 240 over any dsm because eclipses/talons are EVERYWHERE.

If you were talking about a vr-4 or stealth TT though, I'd take one of those over my 240.

Um, taht wasn't that great of an argument, but uh, I havent driven an awd dsm so...get a 240!
rbboyl is offline  
Old 01-08-2003, 12:48 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
kaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 139
What are you looking for. ... Are you looking at 1/4 mile or off the line? Or are you looking at highway speeds and racing on the go? Off the line and 1/4 mile then definetly the AWD but highway speeds or racing on the go then the AWD will hurt you and I would go either FWD DSM or 240.
kaos is offline  
Old 01-08-2003, 05:38 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Sinfestboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: StL to Miami
Posts: 174
Originally posted by spitz7985
the GSX's awd system is 80% of the torque to the front wheels, 20% to the back.
too bad thats...... WRONG!
Sinfestboy is offline  
Old 01-08-2003, 09:37 PM
  #11  
Contributing Member
 
spitz7985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 709
Originally posted by Sinfestboy
too bad thats...... WRONG!

good to see you have plenty of proof to back that up....
spitz7985 is offline  
Old 01-09-2003, 10:57 AM
  #12  
Contributing Member
 
I'm with Stupid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,841
No... it's wrong. They have 50/50.
I'm with Stupid is offline  
Old 01-11-2003, 12:26 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Sinfestboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: StL to Miami
Posts: 174
Originally posted by spitz7985
good to see you have plenty of proof to back that up....
well, lets see... go to either www.dsmtalk.com or www.dsmtuners.com and ask about the power distribution. I have already done that, a long time ago, and guess what......
Sinfestboy is offline  
Old 01-12-2003, 09:14 PM
  #14  
Contributing Member
 
spitz7985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 709
"When you first start to accelerate the car will put more power to the front wheels. The AWD has a center diff and has a Viscous Coupler. The VC is fluid filled and as the centrifugal force from accelerating caused the fluid to move outward it sends power to the rear. The center diff will then do a 50/50 split in power. Because the diff is open it can end up sending more power the front or rear depending on traction. (I added a Quaife center diff which is designed to do the opposite of the open diff.. If the front starts to spin it will send more power to the rear. Stock open diff will send power to the front if they are spinning...)"
spitz7985 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
STREETFAME_240
General
5
05-27-2007 12:08 PM
Chris@AMS
General
2
03-26-2007 10:56 PM
marqSR20
S-Chassis Newbie / FAQs Forum
7
03-19-2004 09:48 AM
ryan15
General
5
02-02-2004 02:33 PM
SilvaPwr
Audio, Video and Security
21
10-14-2002 02:53 PM



Quick Reply: arrrghhh! I need help deciding (dsm/240?)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:40 PM.